Sunday, April 05, 2009

welcome, rubberneckers
(establishing the west)


considering all the noise i've made here over the last several years, i guess this little blog effort would ring a pinch insincere if i didn't, at the very least, comment on the events of this morning.

for those non-huffman members (or those not in attendance today) patronizing the joint, the short version is this. the official announcement was made from the pulpit during worship that humc would be receiving a new appointment come june.

yeah, so?

yeah. that's fair. the story of a new appointment in the itinerant system that is the united methodist church isn't the story. far from it. the story, of course, is how we reached this day. those of you that have been around a while are aware of some of the peripheral mess that happened back in the fall of 2008. if you aren't from around here, you can find what i am talking about if you'd like. if you'd rather not waste your time, can't says i blame you. that's old news now.

we need something fresh. we need something juicy.

well, i hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you've come to the wrong place. listen, this much is true. i've made it perfectly clear that i have a serious distaste for the manipulation of the worship service into something that isn't about being there for worship. i get the temptation. the necessary feel for it to begin like a business meeting and then transform magically into worship. sunday morning will be the largest gathering of your membership every week. it makes logical sense that you'd feel like you need to make every possible announcement about the goings-on of the coming week sometime during the service so the most people possible are in the know. there are last minute things that come up. something needs emphasis and we forgot to bold the font in the bulletin. a last minute prayer request needs to be added. the church van needs gas. ok. we get it. i get it. let's move on. oh, and by the way, 95 percent of these announcements are also printed in front of you. a percentage close to that, if not more, you've already had the opportunity to read in the weekly mailout and on the website. pardon us, but we are going to treat you like you are actually listening right now. i digress. i really do understand the announcements portion of the program. it's the way we and every church have rolled forever. we'll all hunker down and "prepare our hearts for worship" while we are digesting 18 pieces of information together.

the show-stealers, though, come when someone is asked to or takes it upon themself to "announce" something after our hearts are prepared. past favorites have included "sing louder" or "it's not you, it's me" and things of that ilk. things that seem to dumb down the proceedings to the point where having "faith like a child" feels like an insult. any announcement concerning a personnel matter also fits in this category.

again, i get it. the tradition and routine of it all makes it feel right. here is information there is a good chance you are aware of already. if you're not? well, surprise!!! try getting your head on straight after that and feeling as though you've worshipped as you're headed to lunch. but the better chance is that you've heard it already from someone even though you're not "supposed" to have and the result feels like a ceremony. ceremonies can go one of two ways. good or bad. think of every wedding you've ever been to. there is no middle ground. you either loved it because it reminded you of yours or the one in your dreams or you hated it because "it felt too baptist" or something like that. i've never driven away from a wedding thinking, "eh. that was fine." weddings are polarizing for all involved. most proper ceremonies are.

so, this morning we had a ceremony. we announced that one pastor would be leaving and another one would be coming.

woohoo!

or boo!

or sob!

or "wait, weren't we about to responsively read a psalm? what the hell just happened?"

we had a cermony and i hated it. big surprise, right? now, read me correctly. i didn't hate the messenger. i didn't hate the pastor. i hated that it came in the middle of a worship service. and i hated that it felt necessary to disclaim that the message today was about god and not about the proxy. faith like a child, right?

the fact of this morning's passing of the torch was that the announcement didn't matter. at least, not in the context of a worship service. if it did, the above disclaimer would have never needed to be made. the "decision" (if you focus on any part of the commentary this morning, please focus on that word) wasn't made this morning. it wasn't last minute. it was premeditated and cathartic for someone i hope and a little bit selfish in my eyes.

selfish? hello, pot! my name is kettle.

exactly. my point exactly.

um, what?

nevermind. it was what it was always going to be. awkward and sad. for everyone.

as the congregation continues traveling towards our new age of enlightenment, this morning will not be the catalyst that history judges as the turning point. maybe this morning, we merely hit the refresh button and some scabs were torn off and some old, hurt feelings were remembered. maybe this morning, we began to understand the scope of the effort that still lies ahead, because the cold, hard facts are these. there are many of our members that left because they didn't like the senior pastor.

hey, that sounds familiar.

there may be more that leave because they did like this senior pastor and blame others for his no longer being a viable option for us.

hey, that does too!

again, none of that matters. here's what matters. we need good and accurate information to base our decisions on. we need more bible study. we need good attitudes. we need good and honest behavior. we need to be able to make eye contact. we need fewer secrets. fewer dramas. fewer people that think they know what's up and more people that will admit that they have no freaking clue but are willing to work on something good together. we need to follow through on our commitments. we need to decide we if are really interested in the church. we need to allow the prodigal daycare back into our arms for real and not just celebrate it when sarah tells you something good happened. we need good effort. we need more practice. we need more opinions. we need to listen. we need to stop acting like babies. we need nevermore to feel like anonymous is the best option. we need to invite somebody to church. we need to come to a softball game. we need to enjoy each other. we need to come on rainy days. we need to start talking less and loving more. we need to be a church. a methodist church. with small groups and everything.

chris, i wish you and your family well. sorry things didn't work out. good luck.

harris, you have no idea what you are getting into.

and i mean that in the best way possible.

6 comments:

Chris G said...

You know I have been thinking. Maybe in honor of the new pastor and new direction that we will be going in (at least I hope we can go in a new direction since the one we are going in is the wrong way), I think we should dump the lame mission statement that we have (can we all say it???) and go to something more simple. I propose, "Huffman United Methodist Church - Where people are loved." I think at this point thats about all we can claim to do. We certainly arent making or growing anything. Maybe thats all we need to do.

Dolores Bunn said...

Some people have left because of Chris others have left because of you and Kim and others that are making all the noise. Grow up Kevin. the world revolves around the sun not you. "we need to invite somebody to church. we need to come to a softball game. we need to enjoy each other. we need to come on rainy days. we need to start talking less and loving more. we need to be a church." I have invited folks to church. You might get somebody to attend a softball game if the times and location were advertised. I do come on rainy days. as far as "talking less and loving more" try looking in the mirror and saying those words.

Donald Richards said...

Okay 1st thing anyone who reads this
blog if you don't like it don't read it,it's
your choice. Next I'm so sick of our group
being labled as trouble makers when all
we want is good things to happen at
HUMC just because you don't like change
doesn't make it a bad thing or the people
wanting it bad.Dr Denson IS NOT innocent
in all this!People put your big girl/boy pants
on and let's do what's gotta be done.Thanks
for your time,Domald

Tanya Richards said...

Thanks Kevin - I thought that I was the only one who thought the "timing" of the announcement was off. Why wasn't it done before the Light of Christ was brought in? Then there was an announcement and a speech. Of course I was just told on Wed that having the whole baptism service from the hymnal took 15 min and that was too much time to take out of the service. I guess two baptism isn't as important as farewell speeches & announcements.

I have been a member for 10 yrs. Not as long as many but long enough to have seen 10 ministers / associates go and now we will have my 11th. Some I loved, some I liked, and some I could care less about ... I have seen people leave through all of the ministers, I have seen people leave because of other members, programs - heck I was a "Heartsong" member. That's the life of the church. If some people felt like some of us were making too "much noise" I don't know what to say to them except that I am still here. I have disagreed with plenty of things being said and done & I haven't walked out the door.

I am looking forward to seeing what the future holds for our church ... God never closes one door without opening another ... whats behind door #2 ... maybe not a dia but hopefully a loving church family willing to work towards change.

btw - if they do not hire a new children's director as I know is being talked about as an option, I will be LOUD and labled a TROUBLEMAKER. People may leave, but I don't care if they do.
Tanya

Melinda said...

In case one hasn't noticed, our church is in the process of dying. Where are all of the children? Where are all of the young people? Why are we losing members? Us people who are causing the "noise" have realized that something needs to be done to save the church. We could have given up and left, leaving few children or youth but our children like it here and so do we. This is home. Thus, we decided to figure out the problem(s) and begin working on them one by one. If this labels us as "troublemakers" than so be it. We are doing our best to help fix the internal problems. If we can't do that, we can forget growing in numbers. It would be very helpful and welcomed if everyone would let bygones be bygones, stop pointing fingers, and let everyone work together to worship God to our fullest.

Chris G said...

In response to Dolores...

First and foremost we are still here. So whether you think we are troublemakers or if you agree or disagree with our opinion we are still here. We haven't lost hope and we haven't given up. I don't want to go to a church or be involved in any organization where people just "go along" and wont speak their minds about what they think is best. I welcome a good discussion. Its healthy. No one has left because of another person. Period. The have left because they made the decision that they were no longer interested in being a part of Huffman. They gave up, they walked away, they called it quits. If you want to send a message to someone and tell them to grow up and get over it call them instead of Kevin. He has done more to support and encourage growth and continued interest in Huffman than most anyone else I know. I think its pretty bold of Kevin to put his opinions out there day after day for anyone to read. That takes a substantial amount of reflection and he has caught a lot of grief over it but he still continues to do it. He could just as easily do nothing and say nothing. It seems to me that his mirror is in pretty good shape.